Well, it is IMMENSELY ironical. That's why I thought it was funny. Especially that some historians -- particularly the Anglo-Saxons, who seem unable to disconnect from religion in their analysis -- often seem to see it this way. Though they wouldn't get it.
Who is it who called Jesus a terrorist in one of my courses...? Ah, yes, Mme Leclerc in the Roman Social History Course, thus explaining the reason for the crucifixion -- which is for slaves and terrorists. Naturally. It all works out. Except for the conservatives. XD
But for that picture, you'll need portraits of the Robespierristes. Which I'll do someday in a post, like I did for the CSP, but clearly not now, because it's tougher to get portraits of the Robespierristes.
I still have no idea what's your story there though. >___>
no subject
Who is it who called Jesus a terrorist in one of my courses...? Ah, yes, Mme Leclerc in the Roman Social History Course, thus explaining the reason for the crucifixion -- which is for slaves and terrorists. Naturally. It all works out. Except for the conservatives. XD
But for that picture, you'll need portraits of the Robespierristes. Which I'll do someday in a post, like I did for the CSP, but clearly not now, because it's tougher to get portraits of the Robespierristes.
I still have no idea what's your story there though. >___>